China pr - Super League
2026 ▼
Stats ▼
Latest results
Matches
Form Tables
Goals
Halftime
Timing
First Goal stats
Results Grid
Home & Away tables
Tables by Date
Wide table
Points Performance Index
Run-in Analysis
Projected Points
Total Goals
Goal Ranges
Average Goals
Scored vs Conceded
Goal Margins
Lead Durations
Current Streaks
Equalizers
Leagues ▼
China PR - super-league: Goals
Membership Simulator:
Goals Scored + Conceded
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 4.03 | 97% | 90% | 79% | 55% | 38% | 28% | 76% | 17% | 10% | 14% | 7% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 3.90 | 100% | 90% | 72% | 59% | 34% | 10% | 72% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Zhejiang | 29 | 3.62 | 97% | 93% | 69% | 52% | 41% | 10% | 66% | 14% | 24% | 10% | 21% |
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 3.59 | 100% | 90% | 69% | 45% | 31% | 14% | 72% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 3.41 | 97% | 86% | 55% | 52% | 28% | 14% | 72% | 14% | 17% | 10% | 14% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 3.31 | 97% | 83% | 62% | 48% | 28% | 14% | 62% | 7% | 34% | 3% | 31% |
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 3.21 | 93% | 83% | 62% | 34% | 24% | 21% | 62% | 38% | 7% | 31% | 0% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 3.21 | 100% | 76% | 66% | 41% | 21% | 10% | 55% | 10% | 34% | 10% | 34% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 3.10 | 100% | 79% | 55% | 31% | 21% | 14% | 59% | 14% | 28% | 14% | 28% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 3.07 | 100% | 76% | 59% | 41% | 21% | 3% | 62% | 31% | 7% | 31% | 7% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 2.97 | 97% | 69% | 52% | 31% | 24% | 14% | 55% | 24% | 24% | 21% | 21% |
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 2.97 | 97% | 79% | 62% | 38% | 17% | 3% | 69% | 21% | 14% | 17% | 10% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 2.76 | 90% | 76% | 55% | 21% | 14% | 10% | 62% | 17% | 31% | 7% | 21% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 2.55 | 93% | 72% | 48% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 55% | 34% | 17% | 28% | 10% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 2.41 | 86% | 76% | 34% | 28% | 14% | 3% | 59% | 28% | 28% | 14% | 14% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 2.24 | 90% | 66% | 31% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 55% | 31% | 24% | 21% | 14% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 8 | 5.13 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 88% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
| Zhejiang | 8 | 4.75 | 100% | 100% | 88% | 75% | 75% | 38% | 75% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 8 | 4.25 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 13% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 8 | 4.00 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 63% | 13% | 25% | 13% | 25% |
| Shandong Taishan | 8 | 3.88 | 100% | 100% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 75% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 8 | 3.88 | 88% | 88% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 88% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 8 | 3.63 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 75% | 13% | 25% | 0% | 13% |
| Beijing Guoan | 8 | 3.50 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 50% | 50% | 13% | 38% | 0% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 8 | 3.25 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| Shanghai Port | 8 | 3.00 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 8 | 2.88 | 88% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 38% | 13% | 63% | 0% | 50% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 8 | 2.88 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 75% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 8 | 2.63 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 63% | 38% | 0% | 38% | 0% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 8 | 2.25 | 88% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 8 | 2.25 | 88% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 50% | 50% | 13% | 38% | 0% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 8 | 1.88 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 38% | 50% | 13% | 25% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 4.21 | 100% | 93% | 79% | 64% | 43% | 14% | 71% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 3.71 | 100% | 100% | 79% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 86% | 14% | 0% | 14% | 0% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 3.71 | 100% | 86% | 79% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 29% | 7% |
| Zhejiang | 14 | 3.71 | 93% | 86% | 64% | 57% | 57% | 14% | 64% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 14% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 3.53 | 100% | 80% | 73% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 73% | 7% | 20% | 7% | 20% |
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 3.29 | 100% | 86% | 64% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 64% | 36% | 0% | 36% | 0% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 3.14 | 93% | 71% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 14% | 50% | 14% | 43% | 7% | 36% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 3.13 | 100% | 67% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 27% | 20% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 3.13 | 100% | 73% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 27% | 13% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 3.07 | 100% | 79% | 64% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 64% | 36% | 0% | 36% | 0% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 3.07 | 93% | 80% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 3.00 | 93% | 80% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 73% | 27% | 7% | 20% | 0% |
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 2.64 | 93% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 64% | 29% | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 2.53 | 93% | 73% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 27% | 7% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 2.47 | 87% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 47% | 27% | 40% | 13% | 27% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 80% | 27% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 7% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 4.33 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 87% | 7% | 13% | 0% | 7% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 3.79 | 100% | 93% | 64% | 57% | 36% | 21% | 86% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 3.60 | 100% | 87% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 7% | 73% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Zhejiang | 15 | 3.53 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 67% | 7% | 27% | 7% | 27% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 3.47 | 100% | 93% | 67% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 73% | 0% | 27% | 0% | 27% |
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 3.47 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 13% | 60% | 13% | 27% | 13% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 3.27 | 100% | 73% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 7% | 73% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 3.13 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 27% | 0% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 3.07 | 93% | 86% | 71% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 79% | 7% | 21% | 0% | 14% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 3.07 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 57% | 0% | 43% | 0% | 43% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 3.07 | 100% | 73% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 27% | 13% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 2.86 | 100% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 36% | 14% | 50% | 14% | 50% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 2.79 | 93% | 71% | 50% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 57% | 21% | 29% | 14% | 21% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 2.71 | 86% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 57% | 21% | 36% | 7% | 21% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 2.07 | 93% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 36% | 43% | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 1.93 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 29% | 36% | 14% | 21% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| League average | 95.7% | 80.2% | 58.2% | 38.8% | 23.7% | 11.2% | 63.4% | 20.5% | 20.5% | 16.2% | 16.2% | ||
| League average | 93.0% | 79.7% | 59.4% | 44.5% | 28.1% | 17.2% | 63.3% | 21.1% | 22.7% | 14.1% | 15.6% | ||
| League average | 95.7% | 80.2% | 58.2% | 38.8% | 23.7% | 11.2% | 63.4% | 25.0% | 15.9% | 20.7% | 11.6% | ||
| League average | 95.7% | 80.2% | 58.2% | 38.8% | 23.7% | 11.2% | 63.4% | 15.9% | 25.0% | 11.6% | 20.7% | ||
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS
The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.
SoccerSTATS.com Membership info
Goals Scored + Conceded (First-Half)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 1.90 | 86% | 45% | 31% | 14% | 10% | 3% | 24% | 45% | 45% | 31% | 31% |
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 1.76 | 90% | 48% | 28% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 45% | 45% | 34% | 34% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 1.72 | 79% | 59% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 41% | 41% | 21% | 21% |
| Zhejiang | 29 | 1.62 | 86% | 48% | 21% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 28% | 38% | 48% | 24% | 34% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 1.45 | 69% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 48% | 59% | 17% | 28% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 1.41 | 72% | 41% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 14% | 45% | 69% | 17% | 41% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 1.38 | 76% | 34% | 24% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 48% | 52% | 24% | 28% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 1.38 | 83% | 45% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 38% | 66% | 21% | 48% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 1.34 | 66% | 41% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 24% | 48% | 62% | 14% | 28% |
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 1.14 | 66% | 34% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 59% | 52% | 24% | 17% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 1.07 | 72% | 28% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 69% | 48% | 41% | 21% |
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 1.00 | 62% | 31% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 79% | 52% | 41% | 14% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 1.00 | 52% | 28% | 17% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 76% | 55% | 28% | 7% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 1.00 | 66% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 66% | 48% | 31% | 14% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 0.97 | 59% | 31% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 62% | 72% | 21% | 31% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 0.83 | 62% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 66% | 59% | 28% | 21% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 2.00 | 79% | 64% | 50% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 14% |
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 1.86 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 50% | 43% | 36% | 29% |
| Zhejiang | 14 | 1.64 | 79% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 43% | 36% | 21% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 1.57 | 79% | 43% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 43% | 50% | 21% | 29% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 1.57 | 86% | 50% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 50% | 43% | 36% | 29% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 1.40 | 73% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 20% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 1.29 | 64% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 64% | 64% | 29% | 29% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 1.27 | 73% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 53% | 53% | 27% | 27% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 1.13 | 60% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 80% | 47% | 40% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 1.13 | 60% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 67% | 20% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 1.13 | 60% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 13% | 67% | 60% | 27% | 20% |
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 1.07 | 64% | 36% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 57% | 21% | 21% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 1.07 | 73% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 1.07 | 80% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 47% | 53% | 27% | 33% |
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 1.00 | 64% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 79% | 50% | 43% | 14% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 0.87 | 67% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 73% | 40% | 40% | 7% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 2.20 | 87% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 47% | 27% | 33% |
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 1.67 | 93% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 40% | 47% | 33% | 40% |
| Zhejiang | 15 | 1.60 | 93% | 47% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 20% | 53% | 13% | 47% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 29% | 64% | 0% | 36% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 1.53 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 27% | 73% | 7% | 53% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 1.50 | 93% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 21% | 79% | 14% | 71% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 1.50 | 64% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 43% | 71% | 7% | 36% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 1.47 | 80% | 53% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 27% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 1.20 | 73% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 53% | 53% | 27% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 1.20 | 67% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 1.14 | 64% | 43% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 57% | 21% | 21% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 1.07 | 71% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 14% |
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 1.00 | 60% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 80% | 53% | 40% | 13% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 0.86 | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 71% | 64% | 14% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 0.79 | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 79% | 21% | 36% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 0.57 | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 86% | 64% | 29% | 7% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| League average | 71.6% | 37.9% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 54.5% | 54.5% | 26.1% | 26.1% | ||
| League average | 71.6% | 37.9% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 58.6% | 50.4% | 30.2% | 22.0% | ||
| League average | 71.6% | 37.9% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 50.4% | 58.6% | 22.0% | 30.2% | ||
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS
The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.
SoccerSTATS.com Membership info
Goals Scored + Conceded (Second-Half)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 2.21 | 93% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 3% | 0% | 38% | 48% | 21% | 41% | 14% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 2.17 | 93% | 69% | 31% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 34% | 38% | 34% | 31% | 28% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 2.14 | 93% | 66% | 31% | 17% | 7% | 0% | 38% | 34% | 34% | 28% | 28% |
| Zhejiang | 29 | 2.00 | 93% | 59% | 31% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 31% | 45% | 24% | 38% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 1.97 | 93% | 55% | 24% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 31% | 45% | 31% | 38% | 24% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 1.97 | 90% | 59% | 31% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 48% | 28% | 34% | 17% | 24% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 1.90 | 86% | 52% | 34% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 41% | 21% | 52% | 7% | 38% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 1.83 | 90% | 52% | 28% | 7% | 3% | 3% | 31% | 38% | 41% | 28% | 31% |
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 1.83 | 90% | 55% | 28% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 41% | 31% | 31% | 21% |
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 1.83 | 86% | 52% | 34% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 41% | 45% | 28% | 31% | 14% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 1.76 | 86% | 55% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 31% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 1.72 | 79% | 55% | 24% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 45% | 38% | 24% | 17% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 1.69 | 86% | 52% | 21% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 62% | 31% | 48% | 17% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 1.69 | 79% | 55% | 17% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 31% | 62% | 10% | 41% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 1.41 | 76% | 31% | 21% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 24% | 45% | 55% | 21% | 31% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 1.28 | 79% | 31% | 10% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 52% | 52% | 31% | 31% |
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 2.29 | 100% | 64% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 21% | 43% | 21% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 2.27 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 53% | 13% | 33% | 13% | 33% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 2.21 | 93% | 71% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 43% | 50% | 36% | 43% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 2.14 | 100% | 64% | 36% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 50% | 29% | 50% | 29% |
| Zhejiang | 14 | 2.07 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 21% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 2.00 | 93% | 53% | 20% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 33% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 2.00 | 87% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 1.93 | 80% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 1.86 | 86% | 50% | 36% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 21% | 57% | 7% | 43% |
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 1.86 | 100% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 43% | 7% | 43% | 7% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 1.67 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 33% | 47% | 13% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 36% | 64% | 29% | 36% | 0% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 1.50 | 86% | 50% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 79% | 21% | 64% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 1.40 | 80% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 27% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 1.40 | 73% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 40% | 67% | 13% | 40% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 1.27 | 80% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 47% | 53% | 27% | 33% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 57% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 53% | 20% | 40% | 7% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 2.13 | 93% | 67% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 27% | 13% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 67% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 53% | 20% | 40% | 7% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 2.07 | 100% | 53% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 2.00 | 86% | 71% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 36% | 21% | 57% | 7% | 43% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 1.93 | 87% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 20% | 47% | 7% | 33% |
| Zhejiang | 15 | 1.93 | 100% | 60% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 20% | 53% | 20% | 53% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 1.93 | 93% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 50% | 29% | 43% | 21% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 1.87 | 87% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% |
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 1.80 | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 40% | 53% | 20% | 33% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 29% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 29% | 43% | 57% | 14% | 29% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 1.50 | 86% | 50% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 29% | 64% | 14% | 50% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 1.50 | 79% | 50% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 50% | 43% | 29% | 21% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 1.36 | 79% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 64% | 50% | 43% | 29% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 1.14 | 79% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 57% | 57% | 36% | 36% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| League average | 87.1% | 53.4% | 26.7% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 33.6% | 39.7% | 39.7% | 26.7% | 26.7% | ||
| League average | 87.1% | 53.4% | 26.7% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 33.6% | 42.2% | 37.1% | 29.3% | 24.1% | ||
| League average | 87.1% | 53.4% | 26.7% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 33.6% | 37.1% | 42.2% | 24.1% | 29.3% | ||
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS
The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.
SoccerSTATS.com Membership info
Both Teams Scored
Failed To Score
Clean Sheets
Scored in Both Halves
Season summary
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:
56.5%
No goal scored:
4.3%
Away team scored first:
39.2%
Avg minute home team scored first: 29.2 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 33.3 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.07
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.70
Lead-defending rate at home:
58.0%
Lead-defending rate away:
54.3%
Equalizing rate at home:
45.7%
Equalizing rate away:
42.0%
Home team lead duration:
32.9%
Teams level in goals:
46.5%
Away team lead duration:
20.6%
Access Denied
Your current synced membership level is: None
The full Export feature for this table is available with a Supporter Membership.